Synchronous module loading in ES6
One of the great features of ES6 modules is the direct style module loading syntax:
import map from "underscore.js";
... map(a, f) ...
This makes it as frictionless as possible to grow or refactor your code into multiple modules, and to pull third-party modules into an existing codebase. It also makes a common module format that can be shared between the browser and JS servers like Node.
But this direct style requires loading its dependencies before it can execute. That is, it’s a synchronous module load. Put in the context of a script
tag, this would make it all too easy to block page rendering on I/O:
<script>
import $ from "jquery.js";
$('myelement').style({ 'background-color': 'yellow' })
</script>
Throwing this syntax into the browser like this would be an invitation to jank. Thanks to insight from Luke Hoban, I think we have the right approach to this for ES6, which is in fact similar to our approach to avoiding turning eval
into a synchronous I/O operation.
In previous versions of ECMAScript, there’s only one syntactic category of program that you can evaluate, called Program
in the grammar. In ES6, we’ll define a restricted version of the syntax to be used in synchronous settings, which makes it illegal to do synchronous loads. Within a blocking script, the only access to modules is via the dynamic loading API:
<script>
System.load("jquery.js", function($) {
$('myelement').style({ 'background-color': 'yellow' })
});
</script>
This eliminates the footgun, and all of your modules can themselves use the synchronous loading syntax. For example, if jquery.js
wants to use a module — say, a data structure library — it can go ahead and load it synchronously:
// jquery.js
import Stack from "utils.js";
... new Stack() ...
But still, this restriction on the top-level loses the convenience of directly importing modules from scripts. Thing is, in an asynchronous context, there’s nothing wrong with doing a synchronous load. So just like the asynchronously loaded jquery.js
can use the synchronous syntax, we can also allow it in a defer
or async
script:
<script async>
import $ from "jquery.js";
$('myelement').style({ 'background-color': 'yellow' })
</script>
This allows the full flexibility and expressiveness of ES6 embedded in HTML, without any hazard of blocking page rendering for I/O.
The eval
function for ES6 will work the same way, disallowing synchronous loading syntax in the grammar it recognizes, to prevent turning it into a synchronous API. We’ll also add an asynchronous version of eval
that, like script async
, recognizes the full grammar.